OpenBridge LEAP Steel Summaries include geometric ratios (like 6.10.7.3-1) together with stress ratios. This is not helpful, as that ratios is not a real demand/capacity ratio, therefore when that geometric value of "performance ratio" is high, it takes over the table and the designer needs to dig into detailed checks to see actual stress of the structure. I suggest separating this into two summaries - one simply pass/fail geometric (could be simple single line for all pass or list of locations that did not pass the geometric checks) and leave all the summary tables for just relevant stress ratios.